Latest	CTF	DM	BT	MH	Authors	Comments	CTF-BT-MaveReloaded
BT-MaveReloaded Partager Author:  Mave Added: Fri Dec 05, 2008 at 15:17 Rating: 5 Downloads: 117 Download (13.10 MB) 24 comments Comments p-a-w-e-l USER: P-A-W-E-L Godlike! Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 at 20:49 Very nice remake of Cobi's BT+Mave. Very nice atmosphere, nice map's world! As Roel mentioned, that bouncer from A to V is bit weird, though it can be tricky I'm assuming. Overally well done Mave, even if it's remake of Cobra's map! 7/10 RoelerCoaster USER: MMI i4Games Trustee Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 at 14:22 I ike the map, only the dodge wall is a bit anoying sometimes and the bouncer from A to V can be a bit buggy, or is it just me. Good job! Mave USER: MAVE Player Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 at 15:57 Hm, well I prefer R5 cuz of the slide, the blocks at the end and the lags (I don't have lags but nvm ) It's much easier than R10 zomfg xD So I think 5 is a good rating. Cheers Sp0ngeb0b USER: SP0NGEB0B Rampage Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 18:36 This would fit it the best GhOsT USER: GHOST i4Games Admin Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 18:15 ow NO it's rating 10 ! Sp0ngeb0b USER: SP0NGEB0B Rampage Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 17:33 And hell, they are movers }ElitE{Bon USER: BONKET Dominating Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 16:44 There's still these small blocks at end GhOsT USER: GHOST i4Games Admin Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 14:12 isn't this version alot smaller then the first? No? ok 5-6 what shall it be? I wonder what Mave thinks Luck dodge or this bounce at the end would make a big difference but at the beginning? Sp0ngeb0b USER: SP0NGEB0B Rampage Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 13:35 Raiting 6 seems okay. Like Bonket said, many people dont know how to bounce, the map is long and laggy and the small blocks at flags arent easy.. [i4g]CouilleNoire USER: COUILLENOIRE i4Games Admin Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 10:05 Considering the low number of people having captured and the lowest rush time it should be at least a 6. I remember playing the first version and it was not so hard but quite long. So a ratng 4 seems a bit low (even not having actually played it). RoelerCoaster USER: MMI i4Games Trustee Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 08:06 Wasn't the original rating 7? As far as I have come in the map, I don't see too much of a difference (apart from the "M", which is changed completely). So I think a 5 will be OK. }ElitE{Bon USER: BONKET Dominating Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 at 00:07 Ok,there we go. It has a bounce on start,and as we know,not everyone know how to do that. Also,map is quite long,isn't it ? And -> obstacles aren't as ez as for rating 3 map IMO. GhOsT USER: GHOST i4Games Admin Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 at 23:28 i wonder why it should be a 5? Even Mave agreed with 3 or 4 so will make it a 4. More agrees with changing it into a 5? I haven't played this map and won't because of personal reasons so because of that it's hard to rate so even i can be wrong about a rating }ElitE{Bon USER: BONKET Dominating Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 at 21:54 /me agrees. JensonFTW USER: LIGHTNING Unstoppable Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 at 20:35 Only a 3 rating? Surely at least a 5 imo. }ElitE{LAg` USER: LAGGEH Dominating Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 at 00:38 the map would be cool for me but i lag way too much to be able to play it the way i want to Bloeb USER: BLOEB Rampage Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 at 14:08 I love the slidebounce at the start and the lasers, but the dodgewall is too long and the rest of the map is just annoying imo. Especially the end with the small blocks. This is definitely not my type of map. About the looks: I like the skybox, but I prefer slower movers aniani USER: ANIANI Rampage Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 at 13:02 i like the map. maybe dodgewall is a little too long but i like the multicolour lasers gj TsHell USER: TSHELL Unstoppable Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 at 17:50 Ye impressive map but how lag with my ini's ChA1NsAw USER: CHAINSAW Rampage Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 at 22:55 f*cking awesome skybox and fire after spawn. I like it all.  [ Page 1 ]  [ Page 2 ]

Join #i4Games on QuakeNet!

Copyright © 2009-2019 Yannick Delwiche. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer