View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
missy USER: MISSY
Dominating
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 23:23 Post subject: Why Keep trustees who don't play here often
|
|
|
as the topic says why do i4g keep trustees who don't play here regular . got you thinking
Last edited by missy on Wed Nov 23, 2005 00:58; edited 1 time in total
|
|
 |
|
 |
Roko USER: ROKO
Unstoppable
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 23:51 Post subject: |
|
|
Wtf is this question missy? Do you have a problem with some trustees or want to be 1 I think there isn't necessary to play every week to be a trustee.. 
|
|
 |
missy USER: MISSY
Dominating
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 00:08 Post subject: |
|
|
want to be a trustee here ? no thank you got newer games and clans to play ...ut99 was a good game but technology and games has moved on from ut 99 any chance of a battlefield 2 or a quake 4 server medic ? lol or u stuck in the old ages (1999)
|
|
 |
RumBleR USER: RUMBLER
Godlike!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 07:52 Post subject: |
|
|
This is founded and supported for the insta UT only and i believe its not i4games stratey and objective to concentrate on other games Imo it still is populair and communities like this makes it still worth to continue playing.
|
|
 |
[i4g]Medic USER: MEDIC
i4Games Head Admin
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 08:24 Post subject: |
|
|
Wrong question missy.
The problem would not be to keep trustees that don't play often anymore, but to get more trustees if there's the feel there's not enough of them.
Because if a trustee don't play anymore/often, I still trust him/her nevertheless and is always welcome here.
About newer games...
BF2 has many issues if you're an admin (and a player as well). I've been following the BF2 admin mailing list and I've seen more angry people than happy ones so far.
And Q4 has some gameplay problems so I've heard.
So these are 2 games I'm not really up to host anytime soon.
Furthermore, it's not about tech specs, it's about gameplay. In our humble opinions, UT has a very good gameplay and should still keep us busy/happy for years. 
|
|
 |
]MeRc[Kraken USER: KRAKEN
Godlike!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:21 Post subject: |
|
|
There are plenty of ppl here who could be trusties here
We understand that ppl have other have other things to do so let them do them
|
|
 |
royaL USER: ROYAL
Dominating
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:06 Post subject: |
|
|
i think its not bad question a trustee who plays 1 time in week? why? a trustee is for looking that no lame on server or i understand it wrong? and if he is 1 time in week on server LOl this is for nothing :O correct me if im wrong =)
|
|
 |
[i4g]Z USER: Z-ROX
i4Games Trustee
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 14:26 Post subject: |
|
|
I could say the same thing then about players, that don't come here often, should have thier account disabled...
Just because alot of the Trustee's arn't on when your playing, dosnt mean that they are not available to help out in any way needed. Almost all of the active Trustee's are on mIRC as much as possable and will give any help needed to a player, if possable.
I think Medic said it best by saying "Because if a trustee don't play anymore/often, I still trust him/her nevertheless and is always welcome here."
tbh... Jvnkie is one of the best Trustee's i4g has, and even if he only comes here every so often, it would be a sad loss if Medic would take away his Trusree priviliges and replace him with someone else. This goes for all other inactive or half active Trustee's. It's alot better just to take on new Trustee's to fill the gap in online watchfulness.
Just my point of view 
|
|
 |
SPeeD2 USER: YOUNG33
Dominating
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 14:36 Post subject: |
|
|
"one of the best"???????
|
|
 |
cN|iNFiN1TY- USER: EDICIUS
Dominating
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 15:08 Post subject: |
|
|
UT 99 still owns..
|
|
 |
[i4g]Z USER: Z-ROX
i4Games Trustee
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 15:17 Post subject: |
|
|
YouNG33 wrote: | "one of the best"??????? |
I mean this as no offence to all other Trustee's... But Jvnkie is the only one, that I know from all of us, including myself (or should I say "especialy myself?"), that has never let his emotions to take part in his warnings/kicks/and/or/bans... Every warning that I've seen from him has always had his warm humor built into it
It maybe was a stupid idea from me, picking out one Trustee from all of them that don't show up here often. It would be a sad loss for all members if a Trustee (and if you read my first post corectly, I mean ALL Trustee's) that doesnt show up here often, should be put into a "old Trustee's home" and replaced by a younger, new improved Trustee, thats on the servers 24/7.
If you don't think that enough Trustee's are on the servers, then just say so... Medic and C.N. will surely get more then, just leave the "oldies" alone tho... they did a great job here and shouldnt be put out in the cold just because newer Trustee's are needed.
|
|
 |
IxIGavJayIxI USER: GAVINATOR
Godlike!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 15:31 Post subject: |
|
|
TYhe thing is i would love to be a trustee becvause i love i4games.. but i know i will never be one in the forst place..
yeah , you get the regulars one but most of thenm hatdly on i4games.. i think that is what missy is meaning.
|
|
 |
[i4g]ConAir USER: CONAIR
Unstoppable
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 16:00 Post subject: |
|
|
I understand the point that missy wants to make. I use to think that also: No Trustees around most of the time...
BUT since I use mIRC now I know that most of the Trustees can be found in the [i4G] IRC-channels. So there will always be someone around if you need one.
|
|
 |
[i4g]Rainbow USER: RAINBOW
Dominating
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 16:03 Post subject: |
|
|
Even if a Trustee can only play/spec once a week , at least they are keeping an eye on what is happening on the server while they are there .
That time may be when none of the other trustees can be there , so as TESCO says :-
Every litle helps 
|
|
 |
]MeRc[Kraken USER: KRAKEN
Godlike!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 16:27 Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldnt mind havin your job RoX
And well said, Evntually u would be put out to pasture
|
|
 |
|