| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
 [i4g]Z
USER: Z-ROX
 i4Games Trustee
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:19 Post subject: |
 |
|
K... this is a bit late, but for all of you that didnt know it, Medic has put on a sh*tload of new and not so new (those missing since the server move) maps on the mapvote selection. Soooo... nows the time to stop voting the same maps all the time and tryout something new... just don't vote the new maps off before trying them out a time or two, this gives everyone a chance to see how the maps are built and could be played. I've had the chance to play a couple of the newer ones and must say that they were really nice... just give them a try 
Thanx again Medic, it's refreshingly cool to play something new for a change 
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 [i4g]ConAir
USER: CONAIR
 Unstoppable
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:24 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I noticed it too. I enjoyed Blaffende Kikker and specced VaMe. I try to vote the newer maps, but the majority votes mostly otherwise. But still, if you can play 30 of the same old maps all the time. It's quite a variety. 
I even saw Duku around here. Don't like the map, but on i4G I had some fun with it.
Haven't seen all the maps in the list yet. The 1 minute vote.... 
|
|
|
 DanBennett
USER: DANOMANUK
Wicked Sick!!
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 13:20 Post subject: |
|
|
Duku is ok, depends on who is playing and if i'm awake.
VaMe is a nice map, so nice work Vainkey.
I need to look around for the other maps i think...
|
|
|
 ShaDiE
USER: SHADIE
i4Games Trustee
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:17 Post subject: |
|
|
all maps are depending on the players
|
|
|
 Roko
USER: ROKO
Unstoppable
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 14:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| ConAir wrote: |
I even saw Duku around here. Don't like the map, but on i4G I had some fun with it. |
what's wrong with this great map  i mean how come yer don't like it 
|
|
|
[i4g]ConAir
USER: CONAIR
Unstoppable
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 20:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| Roko wrote: | | ConAir wrote: |
I even saw Duku around here. Don't like the map, but on i4G I had some fun with it. |
what's wrong with this great map i mean how come yer don't like it |
Erm, bad CB experience, tbh 
|
|
|
[i4g]ConAir
USER: CONAIR
Unstoppable
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 19:08 Post subject: |
|
|
I tried to play CTF-RUality[fix] (a new map on the server) just now, but something went wrong. And I wasn't the only one. (only 2/3 players made it to server.) First it crashed on the wrong credits.utx version, so I removed the one I had. Than it crashed again on something called credits.base. It's not a bug, but it sure isn't correct either.
|
|
|
{RURU}-el_chico
USER: EL-CHICO
Killing spree
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 18:03 Post subject: |
|
|
Yes i see that recently too on RURU server.....;
I don't understand why some people can play and other no...
So i ll modify the map later and i ll still submit it to MEDIC...
As the map is bugged, you can delete it...
|
|
|
 {lamb}GRiM`
USER: THEGRIMREAPER
Dominating
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 16:16 Post subject: |
|
|
can you have a look at using Duku_CE on the server. Its basically the same with more routes added, should compliment the way the relics are implemented on server
|
|
|
 jaakie
USER: JAAKIE
Rampage
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 07:30 Post subject: |
|
|
CTF-Asteroid has a sky bug
Played this map yesterday and it seemed pretty fun, only problem was the sky that is messed up wich makes it pretty hard on the eyes to play. I searched around and it seemed that is not a problem with all videocards, except for TNT ones and some others.
Thought I had found a solution by scaling the main substracted room a bit so it wouldn't be in collision with the terrain anymore, it worked but when I played it again later it was messed up again...still the solution might be there.
so, any UT doctors that want to take it on and see if they can fix it?
Seems like a fun map with lots of routes and ways to suprise the EF 
|
|
|
[i4g]Vainkeygirl
USER: VAINKEYGIRL
i4Games Trustee
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 07:52 Post subject: |
|
|
Grim wrote
| Quote: | | can you have a look at using Duku_CE on the server. Its basically the same with more routes added, should compliment the way the relics are implemented on server |
Yeah i played it too, i enjoyed it was very nice =D i will spam it a little in the adminchans
|
|
|
 [i4g]izzle
USER: D-JUNK
Player
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 09:34 Post subject: |
|
|
Cool, an extended duku!
|
|
|
 Krig
USER: KRIG
Rampage
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| CouilleNoire wrote: |
That was the intention.
This slows down the defenders coming back from the second spawn room and that also slows down easy escape from the upper side which would be otherwise a lot shorter than going via the on the lower side.
I have spectated too and I found the gameplay was exactly as I planned. Now maybe some players won't like the stairs but that's part of the gameplay.
I would like to add some players made remarks JUST AFTER RESPAWN like "this map sucks" or other stupid things to say without even trying a map. That's not the attitude I expect. If you look at what's played on other servers, you'll find that 80% of the maps played have the "andAction" design and the rest is not really suitable for instagib. That's what really "sucks" IMHO.
I was really chocked by that attitude and that does not encourage me to find or create new maps for iCTF.
That reminds me a long time ago when I started iCTF servers and players would only play Coret and Gauntlet 5 vs 5. That led me to find or help design some of the classic maps that are always voted. Players should be happy to see new maps even if I agree some are less good, objectively this one is good. Just stop voting for the other maps all the time.
Let me know if I still need to care about adding new maps on the iCTF server because I am very doubtful about it at the time being. |
I'm happy to see new maps, but n/o, most of them are really crappy and as you mentioned on other servers, these are imo also ver andaction-like.
I don't say you're not doing a good job, but maybe you could involve more people in valuing the maps.
There are e.g. 3 versions of woot... when you say this is a 7*7 server I don't really understand why there would be one version at all.
CTF-Valkon is not in the list, although it's much fewer spamming than many, many, MANY maps in the list.
A comment on CTF-WallJump2, I've played it with bots once to test it. It's quite impossible to escape high, that "hand made" tunnel is way too buggy to take 3 step without flying around back to the beginning.
And why can't all stantard CTF maps be in the list? I still think that the creators of the game knew most of its possibilities, about mapping and optimizing the gameplay.
NO offence towards the makers of the new maps. The more you make, the better you get. But the best maps are imho still standard maps (and a few custom mades like Scandinavium and other maps I can't really think of atm ;x).
|
|
|
 Mentor
USER: MENTOR
i4Games Trustee
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:23 Post subject: |
|
|
*afaik Scandinavium is on server, I asked that once.
*Besides: Valkon is a nice choice, but also rather preferred with less ppl on server. 7-7 would be rather crowdy.
*Noonraid would still be a nice 7-7 map (but CN curses again when he reads this, because i posted this 4 times already.)
Really love to see noonraid on server, it has 3 entrances to base, and is nice to play 5-5 but i think ideal 7-7.
*Maelstrom: i agree with CN that it's tricky because it only has one flag entrance (compared to niven, which is frequently played)
Krig, do you have any nice ideas from old telenet server? Maps that were frequently played?
|
|
|
Krig
USER: KRIG
Rampage
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 14:56 Post subject: |
|
|
I know Scandi is on the server.
I try to vote is as much as possible ;x
And I just checked the TG forum
| Quote: | [Botpack.CTFMapList]
Maps[0]=CTF-EternalCave.unr
Maps[1]=CTF-Gauntlet.unr
Maps[2]=CTF-Dreary.unr
Maps[3]=CTF-BrokenLimitsCB5
Maps[4]=CTF-Bollwerk105.unr
Maps[5]=CTF-Command-CE2.unr
Maps[6]=CTF-CoretCE105.unr
Maps[7]=CTF-DiamondSword.unr
Maps[8]=CTF-DukuCB3.unr
Maps[9]=CTF-ExtortionCB2.unr
Maps[10]=CTF-Face.unr
Maps[11]=CTF-Noonraid.unr
Maps[12]=CTF-Maelstrom.unr
Maps[13]=CTF-Scandinavium.unr
Maps[14]=CTF-Niven_SE.unr
Maps[15]=CTF-November.unr
Maps[16]=CTF-NovemberCE105.unr
Maps[17]=CTF-Orbital-LE102.unr
Maps[18]=CTF-Ranel-JoltEdition.unr
Maps[19]=CTF-Revenge-LE102.unr
Maps[20]=CTF-SprintaCB3.unr
Maps[21]=CTF-Valkon.unr
Maps[22]=CTF-SpiritCB
Maps[23]=CTF-Disposable-UGL-LE102
Maps[24]=CTF-GauntletCB
|
That's what was played on the server apparently.
I remember there was a nice (NW) map on the server about 4-5 years ago, one that was pretty large (maybe too large for 5*5). I don't remember the name though and I know Cita once told me but I can't find it ;x
That would be a nice one for this server ^^
Last edited by Krig on Tue Dec 05, 2006 19:00; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
BunnyTrack
Blue
Forum
(NEW) CTF-Maps
