Introducing the weekly rankings

zelly.fr · Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 06:17 Post subject:

maybe a thing like that for the best donors imo :p

HARD_TARGET · Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 11:35 Post subject:

How about a sign for monsterhunt performances? Idea

ramdrop · Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 12:54 Post subject:

which servers?

So CTF count on war server and insta1?

nierd_2 · Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 12:57 Post subject:

CTF signs also count on BT servers.

SpeedyGonzales · Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 16:43 Post subject:

I like this alot ! and I like my sign aswell ^^,

Mentor · Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 17:12 Post subject:

think it's a pity you can't go into detail on your stats. Or at least not the avg stats.

Stats like capping avg, avg number of flag gets, really showed a lot about some players.

Alternative:
Is there a possibility to show the average top20 per game? Now it's per month, but I think avg per game is even more interesting, since ppl that play 20 hours a week are almost always on top.
With avg points per game (like before you could see with the checkbox), the list will be varied more I think.

Mentor

And I agree that the efficiency rank is a dangerous one Smile

Effi says nothing about CTF.

Ow yea, sorry I forgot. The system is a nice flashy update of the old system. Point counting is better than the old (sometimes inaccurate) system.

[i4g]Medic · Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 18:07 Post subject:

Old stats are still there, just not directly accessible from the menu (search for "Members" at the top of the site). I'm working on account-based statistics that'll replace them in a near future.

Current rankings are weekly based and not monthly based. So an average by game is a bit less relevant than for monthly stats. I could have such rankings though, but the current one would still be the "authority" regarding the signs rewards, etc. A per-game average would be less accurate if you consider that a player could totally own a single game against only a few players, while the others would play more per week against way more players.

Mentor · Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 18:18 Post subject:

yeah there's always that difference, but when playing with 5 ppl means less ppl to shoot for backup then when playing 13 ppl, thus less backup points available. Of course the criterium would be to be at least in the top100. So not based on one single 'lucky good game'.

Anyway, there will always be differences. It was just to give good players that can only play 5-10 hrs a week the chance to proove themselves Smile

the monthly was a typo, meant weekly. Didn't know old ones were still there. But account-based stats seem nice. For the signs I agree on the total amount of points being the authority.

anyway: explanation is nice, I can see there's more coming soon.
Nice.

gg Yan

[i4g]Medic · Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 22:25 Post subject:

Just for the information... for anyone who'd try to increase their efficiency by any means to get that pretty sign... The efficiency ranking seems cursed! Indeed, 2 of the 3 players who had the efficiency sign have just been banned for life.

So be careful! Razz

nierd_2 · Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 22:38 Post subject:

if that's a cue for " 2 down one more to go ". I WILL FIGHT BACK !

;P

good work tho. Now i'm the best !

*edit: you should adjust ranking tho then. since those members are not here anymore. give the number 4 and 5 the chance to get that sign Mad

ShaDiE · Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 22:51 Post subject:

they will automatic go down next sunday and then there will be 3 new ones Cool

DanBennett · Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 22:51 Post subject:

All i can say, is about time they was banned Mr. Green

NEXT! lol

nierd_2 · Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 22:54 Post subject:

[i4g]Medic · Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 23:08 Post subject:

Only if you remain in the top-3.

}ElitE{Scorp!o · Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 23:33 Post subject:

great system medic, its a fantasic addition to i4g.
one thing to ask though... would it be possible to change the BT skill ranking to something a little more average player friendly? the current system is fine but it doesnt respond to most of our playing styles. very few BT'ers i know like to cap a map over and over again for points, we get one slow cap and then try to get a fast cap, which usually means less points at the end of the game.
to be continued... psp cant handle the amount of text!

	All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
Page 3 of 8