View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
SammmmV USER: SAMMY001
Dominating
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 15:37 Post subject: |
|
|
I found that idea about the shop very good!
I want to come in school with an i4Games t-shirt with on the back: InVeNToR 
|
|
 |
|
 |
[i4g]Cool USER: COOL
Dominating
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 19:39 Post subject: |
|
|
I want my t-shirt too
the idea about shop is very good and it's a good way to donate 
|
|
 |
SAFeSTeR USER: SAFECRACKER
Godlike!
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 19:49 Post subject: |
|
|
Play time and map rank would be nice features.
malevol3nt wrote: | Maybe the timelimit should be based on the ranking of the map. If the map is rank 10 it should have some extra minutes of playtime. A rank 1 map doesn't need to be played for the whole 20 minutes so it should be maybe 5-10 minutes long. What do you think? |
I agree, maybe there could be a variable time limit depending on map rank. Say 20 mins for rank 0 maps and +1 minute for each step up in map rank giving a rank 10 map a total of 30 mins???
|
|
 |
Jazz][Jackrabbit USER: MALEVOL3NT
Player
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 09:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Thats what I was thinking. Its just a matter of how much minutes youre starting with for a 0 rank map. I guess a poll could be made if Medic desides to implement this idea.
|
|
 |
DanBennett USER: DANOMANUK
Wicked Sick!!
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 09:58 Post subject: |
|
|
20 mins for a map that takes you like a minute or even 30 seconds to cap?
OMG I hate them maps :/
|
|
 |
jaakie USER: JAAKIE
Rampage
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:12 Post subject: |
|
|
if then a rating10 map gets for example 35min, less skilled players are going to vote off the map even faster because they have to wait so long for the next one to come..
|
|
 |
DanBennett USER: DANOMANUK
Wicked Sick!!
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:21 Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed.. which is why I said to keep it how it is.
There are 4 BT servers all together... 20 mins is more than enough time, and if need be yu have BT3 and 4 for the record munchers and BT2 for people to learn the map.
I'm only finding less skilled maps and players playing on the BT2 server.. which is lame.. BT1 should not take priority for all the high rating maps and high rated players when maybe the lower people want to try and get a record too...
Would be nice for BT2 to be involved in records too... Maybe only personal records, not proper BT records.
|
|
 |
Cobra USER: COBRA
Unstoppable
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:54 Post subject: |
|
|
DanomanUK wrote: | Indeed.. which is why I said to keep it how it is.
There are 4 BT servers all together... 20 mins is more than enough time, and if need be yu have BT3 and 4 for the record munchers and BT2 for people to learn the map.
I'm only finding less skilled maps and players playing on the BT2 server.. which is lame.. BT1 should not take priority for all the high rating maps and high rated players when maybe the lower people want to try and get a record too...
Would be nice for BT2 to be involved in records too... Maybe only personal records, not proper BT records. |
idd but only if the player don't use a teleport, and he use a teleport, the time is: 00:00:000
and only for Personal, idd 
|
|
 |
DanBennett USER: DANOMANUK
Wicked Sick!!
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:59 Post subject: |
|
|
Not every map on BT2 has Teleports. But yes it would be good if the time would reset when the BTTeleports get used...
Really wish it would record full runs for personal reference. So hey, maybe the B O Double S be Medic could let us know if it is possible or whether he would do this 
|
|
 |
[i4g]Medic USER: MEDIC
i4Games Head Admin
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:02 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I thought of introducing cap times on BT2 if you don't use teleporters.
Stay tuned. 
|
|
 |
DanBennett USER: DANOMANUK
Wicked Sick!!
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 13:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Yay <3
|
|
 |
Mave USER: MAVE
Player
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 13:51 Post subject: |
|
|
nice 
|
|
 |
fierd_3 USER: NIKO
Dominating
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 14:09 Post subject: |
|
|
DanomanUK wrote: | Indeed.. which is why I said to keep it how it is.
There are 4 BT servers all together... 20 mins is more than enough time, and if need be yu have BT3 and 4 for the record munchers and BT2 for people to learn the map.
I'm only finding less skilled maps and players playing on the BT2 server.. which is lame.. BT1 should not take priority for all the high rating maps and high rated players when maybe the lower people want to try and get a record too...
Would be nice for BT2 to be involved in records too... Maybe only personal records, not proper BT records. |
That's exactly why I don't play on BT2, my cap times won't be included in my personal recs so I find it a waste of time to play there.
|
|
 |
DanBennett USER: DANOMANUK
Wicked Sick!!
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 16:09 Post subject: |
|
|
Which is why they're going to be now I guess lol.
|
|
 |
[i4g]ConAir USER: CONAIR
Unstoppable
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 06:00 Post subject: |
|
|
I like the ideas Cobra. All could be very useful. Also I want the i4G T-shirt, new possibility for donating? Not playtime, but just help i4G exist for at least 2 more years.
Would be a binder for organizing i4G meetings. A nice t-shirt with a logo like the wallpapers made. Black and the logo with it.
And I agree with Niko. I suggested the idea a while ago too. I never (or almost never) play on BT2 server, cause if I incidently cap, than I want to have a record straight away. Another positive point about it, people tend to switch a server, if there is a map on, that's too high for their skills. With trying to keep people here, switching between BT1 en 2 could be made easier.
Perhaps you could switch the de UT2k4 server for a BT training server than. If people wanna practice parts, than this way they can.
|
|
 |
|